<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Python |</title><link>https://carlos-hugoblox.netlify.app/es/tags/python/</link><atom:link href="https://carlos-hugoblox.netlify.app/es/tags/python/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Python</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>es-es</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>About Simplicity, Complexity and Deficiencies</title><link>https://carlos-hugoblox.netlify.app/es/blog/2013/04/about-simplicity-complexity-and-deficiencies/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://carlos-hugoblox.netlify.app/es/blog/2013/04/about-simplicity-complexity-and-deficiencies/</guid><description>&lt;!-- Tip: open with the why, then show results, code, and next steps. --&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="border-l-4 border-neutral-300 dark:border-neutral-600 pl-4 italic text-neutral-600 dark:text-neutral-400 my-6"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are two ways of constructing a software design: one way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies; the other is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
– C. A. R. Hoare&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When reading
by Swaroop C H, I found this quote being funny, well constructed and true. The funniest thing in my opinion is that it can also be applied to many other areas apart from computer science, being politics one of the most evident.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>